Assessment Of Acute Toxicity Of Chlorpyrifos And Its Sub-Lethal Effects On Protein Patterns Of Cyprinus Carpio(L.) By Using SDS-PAGE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was focused on investigating the acute toxicity of chlorpyrifos and its impact on electrophoretic protein patterns in the tissues of Cyprinus carpio, an acute toxicity bioassay was conducted in the semi-static system and the fingerlings of C. carpio were exposed to various chlorpyrifos(50%EC)concentrations ranging from 0.1mg/L to 0.7mg/L for 96 h, and acute toxicity was determined as 0.318mg/L. Based on the LC50 value, the Cyprinus carpio were exposed to two sub-lethal concentrations viz., SL-1 (1/5th of LC50, 0.0636mg/l) and SL-2 (1/10th of LC50,0.0318 mg/l) of chlorpyrifos. Proteins have a unique role in cell metabolism and proteomic analysis provides valuable information when variations that occur within the proteome of organisms are compared as a consequence of biological perturbations or external stimuli. The study's goal was to investigate the influence of chlorpyrifos on electrophoretic protein patterns by performing SDS-PAGE on muscle, liver, gill, and brain tissues after exposing fish to two sublethal concentrations in a semi-static system for 3 weeks. The intensity of protein subunits in exposed tissues decreased, and some subunits disappeared, CPF influences both high-intensity protein bands and low intensity as well in both the sub-lethal concentrations. The study has suggested that the changes in the protein banding are more prominent in the SL-1 concentration of chlorpyrifos.The variations in protein subunits band patterns are due to protein deprivation of various proteins, proteolysis, or maybe insufficient amino acid incorporation into the polypeptide chain due to induced stress imposed by the toxicant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".