Functional Outcome Of Medial Distal Tibial Locking Compression Plate Fixation In Distal Tibial Fractures-A Prospective Study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: The Study Aim To Assess The Functional Outcome Of The Fracture Of Distal Tibia Treated With Medial Distal Tibial Locking Compression Plate. Materials & Methods: In The Current Study, 30 Patients With The Distal Tibia Fractures Underwent Reduction & Internal Fixation By Open & Mippo Technique With The Medial Distal Tibial Locking Compression Plate. The Study Was Conducted From July 2018 To December 2020 At Department Of The Orthopedics In Sree Balaji Medical College & Hospital. Results: All Patients Had Excellent Clinical & Functional Outcome. The Age Of Patient Ranged From 23 - 62 Years With The Fracture Seen Commonly In The 4th & 5th Decade Of Life. Out Of The 30 Patients, 18 (60%) Were Male & 12(40%) Were Female, Indicating Male Predominance. All The Cases Were Then Evaluated Using The Iowa Ankle Score, Aofas Scoring Periodically & Only Final Follow Up Scores Were Taken For Compilation Of Results. Functional Results Based On Iowa Ankle Score In Mippo Group Among 18 Patients, 15 Patients Had Excellent Results With 2 Good And 1 Fair Result. In Orif Group Among 12 Patients, 8 Patients Had Excellent Results With 3 Good And 1 Fair Result. Based On Aofas Score In Mippo Group Among 18 Patients, 14 Patients Had Excellent Results ,3 Had Good Result, 1 Fair Result And No Poor Result. In Orif Group Among 12 Patients, 7 Patients Had Excellent Results With 3 Good Result, 2 Fair Result And No Poor Result. Implant Failures Or Deformity Was Not Seen In Any Cases. Conclusion: The Current Study Provides Ample Stability Of The Fracture & Facilitates Early Motion. It Also Helps In Achieving The Rapid Union & Allows The Preservation Of Blood Supply To The Fragment & Achieve Fracture Reduction. The Biggest Advantage Of Fixation Of The Fracture With Distal Tibial Locking Plate Is That Anatomical Reduction Is Achieved & Added Advantage In Mippo Is Fracture Hematoma Is Not Disturbed. This Study Shows That Lcp With Mipo Technique Provides Better Healing Of Fracture With Good Recovery And Lesser Complications Of Treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".