MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380905232 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35308-6

Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Innovations in Computing Research (ICR’23)

2023· book· en· W4380905232 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kevin Daimi, Abeer Al Sadoon

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in networks and systems · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicE-Learning and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of ThessalyInstituto Politécnico do PortoFederation University AustraliaUniversidade de LisboaUniversidade de CoimbraUniversity of BalamandNational Tsing Hua UniversityWestern Sydney UniversityKuwait UniversityAjman UniversityAmerican University of SharjahUniversity of NicosiaUniversity of South AlabamaCairo UniversityHøgskulen på VestlandetUniversity of Technology SydneyDalhousie UniversityCharles Sturt UniversityCentral Queensland UniversityUniversity of EdinburghKing's College LondonYork UniversityCalifornia State University, ChicoAustralian Catholic UniversityConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasUniversity of the PacificNotre Dame University-LouaizeKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchRhode Island CollegeNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetKlaipedos UniversitetasUniversity of ConnecticutCalifornia State University, East BayUniversity of PatrasEscuela Politécnica NacionalFordham UniversityUniversity of East AngliaGerman University in CairoZagazig UniversityMiddle Tennessee State UniversityUniversität PotsdamUniversité Mohammed V de RabatJazan University
KeywordsFeatherPolitical scienceLibrary scienceComputer scienceMedia studiesOperations researchRegional scienceSociologyEngineeringBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1080.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in networks and systemsSame topicE-Learning and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207