MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380925730 · doi:10.3138/ctr.139.015

Women’s Theatre in Quebec: Reimagining the Stage

2009· article· en· W4380925730 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Heidi Bickis

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealmTransformative learningTheatre studiesSpace (punctuation)Political theatreVisual artsArtGender studiesHistorySociologyMedia studiesDramaLinguisticsPedagogyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With this unique two-volume anthology, Louise H. Forsyth offers the English Canadian reader a glimpse of theatre in Quebec, written, starring and produced by women. By creating a space for the transformative voices of Quebec women playwrights within an English-language setting, Forsyth has opened the door for an intercultural encounter between two theatre traditions that don’t often have a chance for dialogue and exchange. The anthology also documents some of the intercultural happenings within Quebec theatre, first with a 努women’s culture” taking its place onstage and secondly, in volume two, with immigrant and First Nation stories making themselves heard. The collection invites readers to engage with a realm of theatre unfamiliar to them and takes the first step towards putting these plays on English Canadian stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0140.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207