MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380925796 · doi:10.3138/ctr.126.027

A Car Bomb at Yonge-Dundas Square

2006· article· en· W4380925796 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Melanie E. Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquare (algebra)ArtVisitor patternVisual artsArt historyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Opening in the spring of 2003, Yonge-Dundas Square has become Toronto’s Times Square, bombarding pedestrians with flashy LED screens that promote a lifestyle beyond means and boasting TO TIX, a last-minute discount ticket vendor. With attractions such as Toronto Eaton Centre and Hard Rock Cafe, the intersection of Yonge and Dundas is Toronto’s number one visitor destination (see “History”). This location is the ideal setting for a car bomb; at least, that’s what Montreal artists and founders of ATSA, Pierre Allard and Annie Roy — with the cooperation of the Theatre Centre, Saw Video and Galerie Saw Gallery — envisioned when they staged a hyper-realistic performance art scene at the square last June.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicCultural Industries and Urban Development→French-language works237,207→