MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380925848 · doi:10.3138/ctr.136.010

Translating Alberta

2008· article· en· W4380925848 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Mieko Ouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClubPollockPerformance artArtGuildArt historyHistoryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I first met the remarkable Toyoshi (Yoshi) Yoshihara in Calgary in 2003, as my first play The Red Priest (Eight Ways to Say Goodbye) was debuting at Alberta Theatre Project's playRites Festival. Born and raised in Tokyo, Yoshihara formally studied Russian language and literature at Waseda University while informally getting involved in theatre after hours in a student club. After a successful career in business, Yoshihara returned to his first love, theatre, and has become Japan's foremost translator of Canadian work. He has translated an astonishing list of Canuck playwrights, from Anne Chislett to Daniel McIvor. Even more interestingly, he has translated the plays of many Albertan playwrights, including John Murrell, Sharon Pollock, Frank Moher and, in recent years, myself. Yoshihara received an honorary doctorate (D. Litt.) from McMaster University in recognition of his introducing Canadian theatre to Japan, and last year, the Playwrights Guild of Canada honoured him with a lifetime membership to recognize his contribution to Canadian playwriting. I spoke with Yoshi from the Banff playRites Colony about his work as a translator and his long-standing connections with Alberta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→