MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380925865 · doi:10.3138/ctr.132.010

“Hedda Gabler Remains a Question Mark”: A Conversation with Judith Thompson

2007· article· en· W4380925865 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Penny Farfan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationIrishArt historyArtPerformance artTragedy (event)HistorySociologyLiteraturePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 30 June 2006, during the Ibsen Centenary Year, and again on 20 February 2007, I spoke with Canadian playwright Judith Thompson about Henrik Ibsen’s feminist—modernist classic Hedda Gabler (1890), which Thompson first adapted and directed for the Shaw Festival in 1991 and then revisited in 200S for a Volcano production in Toronto. She is currently preparing a third version of the adaptation for an upcoming production by the Pittsburgh Irish and Classical Theatre in June 2007. The following is an abridged and edited transcription of our conversations about the play.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0250.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchFrench-language works237,207