MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380925999 · doi:10.3138/ctr.131.006

New Technology, New Technicians and an Ancient Art

2007· article· en· W4380925999 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul Court

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHistorical Astronomy and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingDoorsHistory of technologyVisual artsHistoryEnvironmental ethicsMedia studiesEngineeringArchaeologySociologyArtMechanical engineeringPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of technology is as old as our species. Our hunter-gatherer ancestors would not have survived without tools, and every society in human history has had a technological base that was essential to its survival and integral to its culture. Technology is such an essential part of human society that most of it has become invisible to us. I have been in several meetings in which the use of “technology” was on the agenda, but the word “technology” actually referred to nothing more than the use of computers. The real technological triumph of the meeting itself, conducted inside a heated building in winter and far from a tropical zone, was unacknowledged. The fact that we had not convened out of doors – naked and freezing within walking distance of our burrows – was taken for granted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicHistorical Astronomy and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207