Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crossfiring was a dynamic multidisciplinary art event, involving a dedicated and inventive group of contemporary artists in the creation of dance, theatre, performance art, music and installation art. Presented at the Claybank National Historic site, just outside the village of Claybank, Saskatchewan, Crossfiring was organized by the innovative collective Knowhere Productions, August-September 2006. One of the main features of Crossfiring was the commissioning of a diverse group of artists to create site-specific artworks, including audio-based artworks. The commissions challenged each artist to develop new, unique work that responded to the history and striking presence of the Claybank historic site and the surrounding prairie landscape of the Dirt Hills and Regina Plain; Crossfiring presented me with an opportunity to develop a new installation artwork that would contemplate the historical and geographical layers of this remarkable site. The enthusiasm and interest level of all of the artists was high, and the collaborative opportunities many, turning the Claybank factory and surroundings into a beehive of creative activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".