MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380926275 · doi:10.3138/ctr.130.009

From Wax to Bits: Spoken-Word Recordings in Canada

2007· article· en· W4380926275 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Corey Frost

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEphemeral keySpoken wordWord (group theory)LinguisticsHistoryArgument (complex analysis)PhenomenonComputer sciencePoetryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In trying to define the boundaries of spoken word as a genre, it would be tempting to invoke the “you had to be there” argument and to emphasize the live, ephemeral nature of the form, but spoken word is not purely a live phenomenon. Increasingly, writer-performers in Canada are making their work available through recordings. In the last few years, especially, there has been a flurry — not a blizzard, mind you, but a flurry — of CDs produced by both experienced and new spoken-word artists. The causes, ramifications, and results of this trend, and the way performers feel about recordings, all speak volumes about the nature of the genre itself.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.015
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207