MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380926328 · doi:10.3138/ctr.133.016

“Scrounge” and “Exploit”: Amiel Gladstone Stages Invention and Intimacy in <i>Hippies and Bolsheviks and Other Plays</i>

2008· article· en· W4380926328 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Keren Zaiontz

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidenceArt historyPerformance artArtVisual artsHistorySociologyMedia studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arn ie! Gladstone. Hippies and Bolsheviks and Other Plays. Toronto: Coach House Books, 2007. Hippies and Bolsheviks and Other Plays represents the first published volume of work by the enterprising Arnie! Gladstone, co-founder of Victoria-based Theatre SKAM. Currently an associate artist at th e Caravan Farm Theatre, Glads tone is the second Theatre SKAM artist to be published by Coach House Books. The first, Sean Dixon, the company’s “playwright out of residence” since 1998, so titled because he is based in Toronto, published a volume of plays in 2002, AWOL: Three PlaysJor Theatre SKAM. Gladstone’s collection includes three plays : The Wedding Pool, which made the rounds as a SKAM production at the 2003 Summerworks Festival, in Toronto, and the 2004 Per formance Works sho wcase, in Vancouver, and has since been performed in Victoria and Colmar, France; Lena’s Car, staged at Performance Works, in 2003, as a piece commissioned by the Solo Collective; and Hippiesand Bolsheviks, first produced by SKAM, in 2005, at the University of Victoria, and subsequently dramaturged and staged at the 2006 Alberta play Rites Festival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.024
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicTheatre and Performance Studies→French-language works237,207→