MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380928525 · doi:10.3138/ctr.130.022

The Very First Elephant on the Very First Day: Nicholas Billon’s <i>The Elephant Song</i> Trumpets at the Stratford Regime

2007· article· en· W4380928525 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Robin C. Whittaker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPerformance artVisual artsColonialismHistoryArt historyLiteratureArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nicholas Billon’s playwriting career, born, of all places, on the stage of the Stratford Festival of Canada, has already performed an important moment in the history of Canadian theatre. His play, The Elephant Song, will be remembered not only for its intelligent and efficient dialogue but also for its significant position as the festival’s first world premiere of the very first play written by an emerging Canadian playwright.1 Its inclusion in the festival’s 2004 season begins to answer the vocal challenges posed by mid-twentieth-century theatre nationalists, who viewed the festival as a colonial dinosaur near extinction. It is a striking new work, chosen for production by the festival with the intention of cultivating the promising voice of a new playwright. And as a (contained) critique of institutionalized discourse, The Elephant Song, at its premiere, may be regarded as a (contained) critique of the Stratford theatre regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207