MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380928723 · doi:10.3138/ctr.107.015

Angélique, The Hats of Mr. Zenobe, Still the Night

2001· article· en· W4380928723 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lorena Gale, Robert Astle, Theresa Tova, Gillian Stovel

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInjusticeMotif (music)Space (punctuation)AestheticsHistoryRelation (database)Representation (politics)SociologyArtVisual artsPsychologyLawSocial psychologyPoliticsPolitical sciencePhilosophyComputer scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here are three plays that deal with the clashing of cultures in situations of war and social injustice. All three leave the reader or audience member with a striking set of images and an invitation to consider his or her own position in relation to the story. In all three, I was struck by the consistent use of the motif of infant death, of songs and of staging notes that place little importance on accurate physical representation of time and place. These are plays where linear notions of time and space are rejected for forms of time and space that work according to the needs of the story. All three take a flexible approach to the portrayal of several time periods, a powerfully subjective choice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207