MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380929074 · doi:10.3138/ctr.102.014

Confessions of a Virgin Bride Bride of Franken Fringe: Edmonton’s 18th Annual International Fringe Theatre Festival

2000· article· en· W4380929074 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Shelley Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrideScheduleVisual artsArtHistoryAdvertisingManagementBusinessEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The journey to the Edmonton Fringe begins the previous fall, when theatre artists start filling in forms and coming up with the $535 entry fee. The first twenty-five individuals in the Line-Up method get in, as do lucky participants in the local and international Lotteries. By the middle of November, companies are slotted into the schedule – and have until March, when the program descriptions are due, to come up with a show. There is also a Bring Your Own Venue option, where the company finds a suitable location, pays a reduced entry fee ($300), and negotiates with their “found” venue’s operators and Artistic Associate David Cheoros to ensure that everyone understands the unjuried and uncensored nature of the Fringe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicCinema and Media Studies→French-language works237,207→