MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380929311 · doi:10.3138/ctr.117.011

Struggle to Success: Collective Drama on Anti-Bullying

2004· article· en· W4380929311 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
George Belliveau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaGirlCriminologyYardMedia studiesSociologyPsychologyArtVisual artsDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bullying in schools continues to be a prevalent and complex challenge for administrators, teachers, parents and students. In her recent book The Bully, the Bullied, and the Bystander, Barbara Coloroso claims that “[t]housands of children go to school every day filled with fear and trepidation; others feign illness to avoid being taunted or attacked on the way to school or in the school yard, hallways, and bathrooms” (xvi). The consequences of bullying have led a number of victims to extreme measures, including suicide. To address the severity of bullying, a number of dramatic productions that deal with the issue have been produced, in different places in Canada, for school-aged audiences. A few recent examples include Don’t Say a Word, a collective drama on bullying, written by Vancouver teenagers and facilitated by David Diamond, at Headlines Theatre, in 2003; Theatre Direct Canada’s Ontario school tour, in 2003, of Maureen Hunter and Martha Brookes’ I met a Bully on the Hill; and Joan MacLeod’s The Shape of a Girl, which toured several Canadian cities between 2001 and 2003, with a number of performances attended by school groups. These represent but a few samples of the various Canadian productions addressing the issue of bullying.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicBullying, Victimization, and AggressionFrench-language works237,207