Evolving Permian magmatism associated with arc migration in the southern Beishan Orogenic Collage, Central Asian Orogenic Belt, NW China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Beishan Orogen contains the youngest suture in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt and is vital to understanding its terminal collision history and closure of the last vestiges of the Palaeo-Asian Ocean. Multidisciplinary evidence is provided for a close temporal and spatial linkage between the Liuyuan Complex back-arc ophiolite and the Ganquan Complex arc rocks. The Ganquan Complex mainly comprises felsic volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks and is divided into a lower and upper sequence, both of which exhibit arc-like geochemical signatures and have magmatic zircons characterized by mantle-like δ 18 O values. Their U–Pb zircon ages range between 295 and 286 Ma and between 283 and 281 Ma, with corresponding ε Hf values varying from −4.2 to +1.9 and from +1.3 to +7.6, respectively, indicating a more juvenile magma source over time. The increase of juvenile isotopic signatures in the Ganquan Complex rocks is attributed to arc-trench migration, which progressively removed the arc from influences of an old arc basement contaminant and led to back-arc spreading and formation of the Liuyuan ophiolite. Cessation of the multi-phase Ganquan arc system at c. 280 Ma coincided with the accretion of the continental Baidunzi Complex in the south.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".