MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380987989 · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002305

Improving the efficiency of virtual insulin teaching for patients admitted to hospital through the COVID-19 pandemic: a quality improvement initiative

2023· article· en· W4380987989 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffery Tong, Rebecca Meehan, Dane Iannicello, Raymond Li, Tisha Joy, Tamara Spaic, Tsan-Hua Tung, Kristin K. Clemens

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open Quality · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Canadian institutionsCanadian Patient Safety InstituteSt Joseph's Health CareWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInsulinPandemicReferralDiabetes mellitusCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)NursingInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, many areas of medicine transitioned to virtual care. For patients with diabetes admitted to hospital, this included diabetes education and insulin teaching. Shifting to a virtual model of insulin teaching created new challenges for inpatient certified diabetes educators (CDE). OBJECTIVE: We advanced a quality improvement project to improve the efficiency of safe and effective virtual insulin teaching throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Our primary aim was to reduce the mean time between CDE referral to successful inpatient insulin teach by 0.5 days. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We conducted this initiative at two large academic hospitals between April 2020 and September 2021. We included all admitted patients with diabetes who were referred to our CDE for inpatient insulin teaching and education. INTERVENTION: Alongside a multidisciplinary team of project stakeholders, we created and studied a CDE-led, virtual (video conference or telephone) insulin teaching programme. As tests of change, we added a streamlined method to deliver insulin pens to the ward for patient teaching, created a new electronic order set and included patient-care facilitators in the scheduling process. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Our main outcome measure was the mean time between CDE referral and successful insulin teach-back. Our process measure was the percentage of successful insulin pen deliveries to the ward for teaching. As balance measures, we captured the percentage of patients with a successful insulin teach, the time between insulin teach and hospital discharge, and readmissions to hospital for diabetes-related complications. RESULTS: Our tests of change improved the efficiency of safe and effective virtual insulin teaching by 0.27 days. The virtual model appeared less efficient than usual in-person care. CONCLUSIONS: In our centre, virtual insulin teaching supported patients admitted to hospital through the pandemic. Improving the administrative efficiency of virtual models and leveraging key stakeholders remain important for long-term sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open QualitySame topicHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsFrench-language works237,207