Effect of 6-week treatment with topical betamethasone dipropionate in patients with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of topical corticosteroid over 6 weeks in patients with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis. Design: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, community-based participants with hand osteoarthritis were randomly assigned (1:1) to topical Diprosone OV (betamethasone dipropionate 0.5 mg/g in optimised vehicle, n=54) or placebo (plain paraffin, n=52) ointment to painful joints 3 times daily for 6 weeks. Primary outcome was pain reduction [assessed by 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)] at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in pain and function using the Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN), Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA), and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) at 6 weeks. Adverse events were recorded. Results: Of 106 participants (mean age 64.2 years, 85.9% female), 103 (97.2%) completed the study. Change in VAS at 6 weeks was similar in the Diprosone OV and placebo groups (-19.9 vs. -20.9, adjusted difference 0.6, 95% CI -8.9 to 10.2). There were no significant between-group differences in change in AUSCAN pain [adjusted difference 25.8 (-16.0 to 67.5)], AUSCAN function [21.2 (-55.0 to 97.4)], FIHOA [-0.1 (-1.7 to 1.5)], or MHQ [-1.2 (-6.0 to 3.6)]. Incidence of adverse events was 16.7% in Diprosone OV and 19.2% in placebo group. Conclusions: Topical Diprosone OV ointment, although well-tolerated, was no better than placebo in improving pain or function over 6 weeks in patient with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis. Future studies should consider examining joints with synovitis and whether delivery approaches enhancing transdermal penetration of corticosteroids into joints are effective in hand osteoarthritis. Trial registration: ACTRN 12620000599976. Registered May 22, 2020.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".