MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380991364 · doi:10.22329/il.v43i2.8057

In Memoriam

2023· article· en· W4380991364 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Informal Logic

Bibliographic record

VenueInformal Logic · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophySociologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

So often we hear the phrase "a gentleman and a scholar," but so rarely do we know someone who truly deserves that title.Derek Allen, who died unexpectedly at the end of April, was such a person.Quiet in his demeanour and gracious in manner, this surface hid a fierce intellect that could cut to the heart of a paper and identify exactly what was wrong (or right) with an argument.He was a frequent contributor to Informal Logic, with papers distributed over more than three decades.And he was an even more frequent referee for the journal, providing the kinds of detailed, constructive reviews that authors valued and that the editors came to rely upon.Derek gave every task his total commitment.Alas, his perceptive keynote address at the last Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) conference in 2020 was to be his final contribution to an important body of work that will continue to repay careful study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInformal LogicSame topicEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207