MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380992585 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accf89

Subarcminute Localization of 13 Repeating Fast Radio Bursts Detected by CHIME/FRB

2023· article· en· W4380992585 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniele Michilli, Mohit Bhardwaj, Charanjot Brar, B. M. Gaensler, V. M. Kaspi, A. Yu. Kirichenko, Kiyoshi W. Masui, Ryan Mckinven, Cherry Ng, C. Patel, Ketan R. Sand, Paul Scholz, Kaitlyn Shin, Seth R. Siegel, I. H. Stairs, Tomás Cassanelli, Amanda M. Cook, M. Dobbs, Fengqiu Adam Dong, Emmanuel Fonseca, Adaeze L. Ibik, Jane Kaczmarek, Calvin Leung, Aaron B. Pearlman, Emily Petroff, Ziggy Pleunis, Masoud Rafiei-Ravandi, Pranav Sanghavi, J. Richard Shaw, Shriharsh P. Tendulkar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesMcGill Space InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasUniversity of TorontoCanada Research ChairsNational Defense Science and Engineering GraduateSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryU.S. Department of DefenseMcGill UniversityCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomyFast radio burstGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report on improved sky localizations of 13 repeating fast radio bursts (FRBs) discovered by CHIME/FRB via the use of interferometric techniques on channelized voltages from the telescope. These so-called “baseband localizations” improve the localization uncertainty area presented in past studies by more than three orders of magnitude. The improved localization regions are provided for the full sample of FRBs to enable follow-up studies. The localization uncertainties, together with the limits on the source distances from their dispersion measures, allow us to identify likely host galaxies for two of the FRB sources. FRB 20180814A lives in a massive passive red spiral at z ∼ 0.068 with very little indication of star formation, while FRB 20190303A resides in a merging pair of spiral galaxies at z ∼ 0.064 undergoing significant star formation. These galaxies show very different characteristics, further confirming the presence of FRB progenitors in a variety of environments even among the repeating subclass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207