Hot-forming of a 980 MPa third generation advanced high strength steel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper considers the effect of processing route on the final microstructure hardness and tensile behavior of a 980 MPa third generation advanced high strength steel (3G-AHSS). Of particular interest is the use of a hot stamping thermal schedule that mimics a quench and partition (Q&P) heat treatment process normally used to produce Q&P grade steel sheet. For comparison purposes, samples were also produced using a quench and temper (Q&T) processing history. The experiments were performed using a Gleeble 3500 thermo-mechanical simulator system. Large coupons were produced using both processing routes from which microstructure, hardness, and tensile samples were extracted. Mechanical properties results were compared with the as-received material. Both processing routes resulted in strength levels that were close to that of the as-received material; however, the total elongation of the Q&P processed samples was 52% higher than that of the Q&T processed material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".