The Dynamics of Quarter Life Crisis and Coping Strategies for Final Year Undergraduate Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter-life crisis is a crisis that occurs in individuals aged 20 years and over. In this phase it becomes a difficult phase because of a significant change, previously the individual focused on spending school years but after that he was forced to take responsibility for himself. The purpose of this study is to see the dynamics of the quarter life crisis and coping strategies carried out by individuals who are carrying out lectures at IPB University. The purpose of this study is to look at the dynamics of quarter-life crises and coping strategies by individuals who are currently running lectures at the final year undergraduate. The respondents in the study were 11 final year undergraduate students who were carrying out lectures at the final level. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions (FGD). The results showed that each individual experienced a different quarter-life crisis, with the most of problems faced are anxiety about the future. Each individual has a different coping strategy in dealing with the crisis they are experienced. The differences comes because of differences in responding problem, parenting style and personality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".