MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380997815 · doi:10.3390/d15060774

Spatiotemporal Variability in Subarctic Lithothamnion glaciale Rhodolith Bed Structural Complexity and Macrofaunal Diversity

2023· article· en· W4380997815 on OpenAlexafffund
David Bélanger, Patrick Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversity · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of NewfoundlandResearch and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador
KeywordsBenthic zoneEcologyBiodiversityHabitatCoralline algaeMarine protected areaPropaguleOceanographyBiologyGeologyAlgae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhodoliths are non-geniculate, free-living coralline red algae that can accumulate on the seafloor and form structurally complex benthic habitats supporting diverse communities known as rhodolith beds. We combined in situ rhodolith collections and imagery to quantify variability, over 9 months and at two sites, in the structural complexity and biodiversity of a subarctic Lithothamnion glaciale rhodolith bed. We show that the unconsolidated rhodolith framework is spatially heterogeneous, yet provides a temporally stable habitat to an abundant and highly diverse macrofauna encompassing 108 taxa dominated by brittle stars, chitons, bivalves, gastropods, polychaetes, sea urchins, and sea stars. Specific habitat components, including large bivalve shells, affect rhodolith morphology and resident macrofauna, with increasingly large, non-nucleated rhodoliths hosting higher macrofaunal density, biomass, and diversity than increasingly large, shell-nucleated rhodoliths. The present study’s fine taxonomic resolution results strongly support the notion that rhodolith beds are biodiversity hotspots. Their spatial and temporal domains provide clear quantitative evidence that rhodolith beds provide a stable framework under the main influence of biological forcing until sporadic and unusually intense physical forcing reworks it. Our findings suggest that shallow (<20 m depth) rhodolith beds are vulnerable to ongoing and predicted increases in the frequency and severity of wave storms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversitySame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207