Precious metal amorphous AgAuSi: Alloy design by swapping gold for silver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• New family of Ag x Au 85-x Si 15 amorphous alloys for 20 < x < 60 is synthesized by co-sputtering. • Temperature dependence of electrical resistance indicated small amounts of nanocrystalline phase confirmed by HRTEM. • All alloys exhibit high hardness, 2% of elastic strain and 1–2% of tensile plasticity when tested on polymer substrates. • Complex chemistry-properties and structure-properties relationships of the alloy family are elucidated. To expand the basis for property-oriented material design, complex relationships between chemistry, atomistic structure, and properties of sputter-deposited Ag x Au 85-x Si 15 alloys are investigated using versatile experimental methods. According to differential scanning calorimetry and X-ray diffraction data, the alloys are amorphous within a wide compositional range of 20 ≤ x ≤ 60 at%. However, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy revealed noticeable amounts of crystallites in limiting compositions with x = 20 at% and x = 60 at%. Glass transition and crystallization temperatures grow with increasing Ag content, while room-temperature resistivity and temperature coefficient of resistance are shown to be highly sensitive to the amount of crystalline phase. Neither the existence of nanocrystallites nor the substitution of Ag by Au affected significantly the mechanical properties. All compositions exhibit similar nanoindentation hardness of about 4.3 GPa, Young’s modulus of about 55 GPa, and macroscopic elastic limit of about 2%. The unique combination of high hardness, high elastic strain but low Young’s modulus together with the expected chemical inertness inherited from noble metals makes this alloy family suitable for biomedical applications in form of coatings or in jewelry if an economic bulk production route will be developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".