<i>In vitro</i> production of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in antemortem blood under various storage conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
gamma-Hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is an endogenous compound and central nervous system depressant drug used recreationally for its intoxicating effects. In a medico-legal context, the interpretation of blood GHB concentrations can be complicated by its endogenous nature and potential for formation during storage. In Canada, the per se limit for GHB in blood is 5 mg/L. Endogenous GHB concentrations in blood are typically well below 5 mg/L; however, there is a paucity of literature regarding the potential production of GHB in antemortem blood during storage. Changes in GHB concentrations were evaluated over the course of 306 days in preserved and unpreserved antemortem blood stored at 4°C and 21°C. Results were compared to 22 impaired driving cases in Ontario between 2019 and 2022 where GHB was detected in antemortem blood by toxicological analysis at the Centre of Forensic Sciences. Preservative was effective at minimizing GHB production (< 2.5 mg/L) regardless of storage temperature, whereas significant in vitro production of GHB occurred in unpreserved antemortem blood. GHB production occurred rapidly in unpreserved blood stored at 21°C; a significant increase was detected after 5 days. The rate of GHB production in unpreserved blood stored at 4°C occurred more gradually but increased significantly by day 30 and reached a maximum concentration of 10 mg/L at 114 days. In unpreserved blood, GHB concentrations were significantly lower at 4°C compared to 21°C for the first 44 days; however, refrigeration had no significant effect then onward. Blood concentrations of GHB detected in the majority of impaired driving cases were markedly higher than the maximum concentration of 10 mg/L detected in the study; however, in 4 of the 22 cases, concentrations were below 10 mg/L. The results demonstrate that concentrations of GHB less than 10 mg/L in blood collected for the purposes of a drug-impaired driving investigation should be carefully interpreted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".