MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381057197 · doi:10.3397/nc_2023_0007

Utilizing an open-source peak finding algorithm for noise and vibration highway assessments

2023· article· en· W4381057197 on OpenAlexaff
Ben Saunders, Jacob Poling

Bibliographic record

VenueNOISE-CON proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmVibrationStatistical analysisNoise (video)AxleComputer scienceTraffic noiseTraffic countStatisticsEngineeringMathematicsTransport engineeringTraffic volumeAcousticsArtificial intelligenceStructural engineeringNoise reduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An open-source peak finding algorithm has been used to calculate maximum sound pressure levels representing vehicle pass-bys as a part of a recent complaint investigation in the UK. Levels were matched to automated traffic count (ATC) data which were split into categories by axle count. A statistical analysis was then conducted to determine the effectiveness of various mitigation options to reduce sleep disturbance. A similar approach using the same peak-finding algorithm and related statistical analysis was used to determine the influence of resurfacing a highway in the US. The technique was refined during the study with respect to AASHTO T 389-20 and ISO 11819-1 for this purpose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNOISE-CON proceedingsSame topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207