MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381060426 · doi:10.4000/books.puc.16866

L’expérience de la fatalité dans deux nouvelles de Roberto Bolaño

2020· book-chapter· fr· W4381060426 on OpenAlex
Pablo Virguetti

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Caen eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous nous interrogeons sur la fatalité en tant que fatum grec, c’est-à-dire le sujet face à son destin inéluctable, et en tant que fatalisme, pensée matérialiste qui stipule que les affres de l’existence obéissent à un rapport de cause à effet. Ces deux formes tentent d’expliquer la violence. Cette violence est représentée dans la littérature de Roberto Bolaño comme une expérience individuelle et subjective du vécu. Il est possible de trouver une représentation de la fatalité dans les textes de l’écrivain chilien. Nous nous intéressons à deux nouvelles de l’auteur et l’intérêt est de dégager le rapport entre l’individu et l’expérience de la violence, sa perception et son attitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it