A question prompt list for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a common cause of premature mortality in people with epilepsy.1 Professional guidelines and existing data from caregivers of children with epilepsy support SUDEP risk disclosure in the clinical setting. 1 Yet SUDEP risk disclosure remains a challenge for both clinicians and caregivers.2 Barriers to clinician risk disclosure may include fear of exacerbating caregiver anxiety, discomfort navigating complex communication, lack of knowledge, and limitations in SUDEP prevention strategies.2 Caregivers may be unsure of which questions to ask or feel hesitant voicing their questions.2 Question prompt lists (QPLs) have the potential to empower caregiver question-asking and decrease unmet informational needs about SUDEP.3 In a prospective cross-sectional study, we consulted existing literature on SUDEP communication preferences to design a 24-question survey for caregivers of children with epilepsy.4 A stakeholder advisory committee comprised of caregivers, epileptologists, and advocates provided guidance on study design and survey content. Of the survey questions, 14 asked for caregiver demographic information and child epilepsy history, while 10 centered on caregivers' knowledge of SUDEP and communication preferences for SUDEP risk disclosure.5 To collect responses from caregivers, we partnered with advocacy organizations, who posted a link to the survey in their general membership groups. An open-ended survey question prompted caregivers to list any questions they recommend that other patients and families ask their clinicians about SUDEP. Caregiver responses were collated, collapsed, and refined for clarity and reading level. We used Canva (Canva Pty Ltd.) to generate a QPL to complement conversations about SUDEP risk. One hundred nineteen of the 212 caregivers who participated in the survey submitted a total of 251 questions. Respondents had a median age of 42 years (range: 18–69 years), had children with a median of 15 seizures per year (range: 4–≥100), and primarily identified as White (n = 112/119, 94.1%). Twelve respondents identified as bereaved (Table 1). Collation and categorization of caregiver responses resulted in the identification of 14 questions endorsed by caregivers (Figure 1). Suggested questions included content about ways to mitigate risk, such as “Is there anything that I can do to prevent SUDEP?” and “What is the safest way for my child to sleep?” Other questions, such as “How do I talk about SUDEP with my child's siblings?” focused on addressing SUDEP with loved ones. Caregivers also sought to know how SUDEP risk would impact the quality of life and activities of daily living, submitting questions such as “What does the risk of SUDEP mean for my child's daily life?” A prior publication from this cohort summarizes caregivers' self-reported preferences for SUDEP risk disclosure.4 We present a novel caregiver-informed tool to support discussions about SUDEP. By empowering caregivers to think about important topics and disclose their concerns to clinicians, this SUDEP-specific QPL may enhance bidirectional communication, decrease parental anxiety, and promote treatment adherence.3, 6, 7 To date, few QPLs have targeted pediatric populations, and none have been developed for people living with epilepsy or their caregivers.3, 6, 7 A QPL designed for parents of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was endorsed by parents and clinicians alike for prompting discussion and question-asking.6 A QPL has been developed for parents of infants with neurologic impairment; parents valued the tool for giving them a sense of permission to ask about challenging topics.3 Future work should test the impact of the QPL presented here on unmet information needs, question-asking, and self-efficacy. Strengths of this study include our engagement with stakeholders who hold shared interests in improving the landscape of epilepsy care and research, including families of children with epilepsy. Existing cohorts demonstrate that patient-centered partnerships strengthen research and can help ensure that research efforts better reflect the needs of the epilepsy community.8 The study's strengths should be viewed in light of its limitations, such as the homogeneous demographic profile of the respondents. The recruitment strategy may have resulted in selection bias toward caregivers with the highest level of engagement in advocacy organizations on social media, limiting generalizability to broader populations. Diverse recruitment methods are needed to ensure that communication tools capture concerns held by all caregiver groups. Future work should consider cultural adaptation, translation to other languages, and exploration of cultural barriers that may influence question-asking. The questions commonly recommended by this cohort of caregivers affirm existing data and guidelines suggesting that clinicians should engage epilepsy patients and caregivers in conversations about SUDEP risk.4, 5 To meet the informational needs expressed by caregivers, these conversations should include basic details on SUDEP, risk reduction efforts, considerations for the future, and strategies to maintain psychosocial well-being alongside physical health. Communication tools like this QPL can serve as a strategy to facilitate comprehensive conversations about SUDEP risk disclosure.3 Future work will involve user testing to assess the acceptability and efficacy of this tool in clinical practice. Simran Bansal: Conceptualization; formal analysis; writing—original draft. Isabella K. Pallotto: Data curation; formal analysis; writing—review and editing. Renée A. Shellhaas: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing. Gardiner Lapham: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing. Thomas Stanton: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing. Zachary Grinspan: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing. Jeffrey Buchhalter: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing. Elizabeth J. Donner: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing. J. Kelly Davis: Formal analysis; project administration; writing—review and editing. Shital H. Patel: Conceptualization; writing—review and editing. Monica E. Lemmon: Conceptualization; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; supervision. We are grateful to the many caregiver participants who shared their advice and experiences. We are indebted to the BAND Foundation, Danny Did Foundation, Epilepsy Foundation, Child Neurology Foundation, Hope for HIE, and the Rare Epilepsy Network for their partnership. This work was supported by the BAND Foundation. Dr. Shellhaas is a consultant for the Epilepsy Study Consortium and receives royalties from UpToDate for authorship of topics related to neonatal seizures. Further, she is a member of the Board of Directors for the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Foundation. Her research is supported by grants from the NIH. Ms. Lapham is affiliated with the BAND Foundation. Dr. Buchhalter receives compensation for serving as a consultant to the Epilepsy Foundation, Epilepsy Study Consortium, Epilog, Neurocrine Inc., and UCB. He provides consultation services without compensation to the American Academy of Neurology and Partners Against Mortality in Epilepsy. Dr. Lemmon's research is funded by the NIH. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.