MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381145014 · doi:10.18608/hla22.003

Predictive Modelling in Teaching and Learning

2022· book-chapter· en· W4381145014 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Brooks, Craig Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueSolar eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOnline Learning and Analytics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperationalizationPredictive analyticsComputer scienceLearning analyticsProcess (computing)Field (mathematics)Data scienceEducational data miningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes the process, practice, and challenges of using predictive modelling in teaching and learning. In both the fields of Educational Data Mining (EDM) and Learning Analytics (LAK) predictive modelling has become a core practice of researchers, largely with a focus on predicting student success as operationalized by academic achievement. In this paper we aim to provide a general overview of considerations when performing and applying predictive modelling, the steps which an educational data scientist must consider when engaging in the process, and a brief overview of the most popular techniques in the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSolar eBooksSame topicOnline Learning and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207