Development of a Minimalistic Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (mPBPK) Model for the Preclinical Development of Spectinamide Antibiotics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spectinamides 1599 and 1810 are lead spectinamide compounds currently under preclinical development to treat multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis. These compounds have previously been tested at various combinations of dose level, dosing frequency, and route of administration in mouse models of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection and in healthy animals. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling allows the prediction of the pharmacokinetics of candidate drugs in organs/tissues of interest and extrapolation of their disposition across different species. Here, we have built, qualified, and refined a minimalistic PBPK model that can describe and predict the pharmacokinetics of spectinamides in various tissues, especially those relevant to Mtb infection. The model was expanded and qualified for multiple dose levels, dosing regimens, routes of administration, and various species. The model predictions in mice (healthy and infected) and rats were in reasonable agreement with experimental data, and all predicted AUCs in plasma and tissues met the two-fold acceptance criteria relative to observations. To further explore the distribution of spectinamide 1599 within granuloma substructures as encountered in tuberculosis, we utilized the Simcyp granuloma model combined with model predictions in our PBPK model. Simulation results suggest substantial exposure in all lesion substructures, with particularly high exposure in the rim area and macrophages. The developed model may be leveraged as an effective tool in identifying optimal dose levels and dosing regimens of spectinamides for further preclinical and clinical development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".