Service-level-driven procurement and production lot-sizing problem with demand fulfilment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents novel models for the Integrated Procurement and Lot-Sizing Problem with multiple customers and backlogging. Since allowing backlog in a traditional cost minimisation model involves dealing with intangible costs of not fulfilling the demand on time, we propose optimising service-levels while keeping the costs minimal using a budget constraint. The motivation of this study emanates from a manufacturing company that assembles commercial and industrial refrigeration equipment, using both purchased materials and in-house products. Instead of considering an aggregate demand, we consider the specific demand from various customers. This allows us to incorporate demand fulfilment decisions into the model in case of stock-outs by deciding which customers will have their orders backlogged. The fill-rate, or β service-level, is considered both globally and for customers and products individually. Computational experiments show that the service-level-driven models improve service when compared to the traditional cost model and also end up enforcing service equity among different customers at the expense of a deterioration in the global fill-rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".