MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381167306 · doi:10.1111/jopy.12727

Issue Information

2023· paratext· en· W4381167306 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Personality · 2023
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Behavioral Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonUniversität BremenUniwersytet WarszawskiShaanxi Normal UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversiteit UtrechtUniversity of EdinburghUniversity of ReadingUniversity of MelbourneFriedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaMarquette UniversityUniversity of South AlabamaUniversity of OregonMcMaster UniversityUniversity of California, DavisArizona State UniversityVirginia Commonwealth UniversityVictoria University of WellingtonUniversity of Notre DameUniversität LeipzigUniversity of ConnecticutBrock UniversityUniversity of RochesterUniversity of British ColumbiaVillanova UniversityMichigan State UniversityWashington State UniversityWake Forest UniversityCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of WashingtonMcGill UniversityTexas Tech UniversityUtah State UniversityFlorida State UniversityPurdue UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaGeorgia Southern UniversityVictoria UniversityFlorida Atlantic UniversityFranklin W. Olin College of EngineeringWilfrid Laurier UniversityGeorge Mason UniversityUniversidad del AtlánticoUniversity of MinnesotaWellesley College
KeywordsCitationPersonalityPsychologyComputer scienceInformation retrievalWorld Wide WebSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2148.00 (US), US$3587.00 (Rest of World), €2,326.00(Europe), £1,834.00(UK).Prices are exclusive of tax.Asia-Pacifi c GST,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9500.919

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PersonalitySame topicSocial and Behavioral StudiesFrench-language works237,207