MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381187032 · doi:10.3917/gmcc.290.0037

Tensions mémorielles Empire/Canada/Québec à travers la mise en place des monuments aux morts québécois dans l’Entre-deux-guerres

2023· article· fr· W4381187032 on OpenAlex
Mourad Djebabla

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGuerres mondiales et conflits contemporains · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College Saint-Jean
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Première Guerre mondiale au Canada est un événement porteur tant d’union, autour de l’action des hommes au front, que de désunion avec les tensions nées au pays autour de l’ampleur de l’effort de guerre. La guerre terminée, le souvenir des combattants disparus, dont les corps demeurent outre-mer, fait naître un besoin de matérialisation de l’hommage à rendre à leur sacrifice. À la mémoire des combattants disparus se greffe les attentes politiques des vivants qui évoluent, dans les années 1920-1930, dans une société canadienne qui se détache progressivement de la tutelle impériale pour faire valoir une identité nationale canadienne. À travers la mobilisation pour la construction d’un monument aux morts, mais aussi par la forme choisie ou les inscriptions qui les composent, pour qui sait les décoder, il en transparait des indices du rapport de la société canadienne de l’entre-deux-guerres au sens à donner au sacrifice des combattants de 1914-1918.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it