Tensions mémorielles Empire/Canada/Québec à travers la mise en place des monuments aux morts québécois dans l’Entre-deux-guerres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Première Guerre mondiale au Canada est un événement porteur tant d’union, autour de l’action des hommes au front, que de désunion avec les tensions nées au pays autour de l’ampleur de l’effort de guerre. La guerre terminée, le souvenir des combattants disparus, dont les corps demeurent outre-mer, fait naître un besoin de matérialisation de l’hommage à rendre à leur sacrifice. À la mémoire des combattants disparus se greffe les attentes politiques des vivants qui évoluent, dans les années 1920-1930, dans une société canadienne qui se détache progressivement de la tutelle impériale pour faire valoir une identité nationale canadienne. À travers la mobilisation pour la construction d’un monument aux morts, mais aussi par la forme choisie ou les inscriptions qui les composent, pour qui sait les décoder, il en transparait des indices du rapport de la société canadienne de l’entre-deux-guerres au sens à donner au sacrifice des combattants de 1914-1918.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".