Deep causal feature extraction and inference with neuroimaging genetic data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a severe public health issue in the world. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) offers a way to study brain differences between AD patients and healthy individuals through feature extraction and comparison. However, in most previous works, the extracted features were not aimed to be causal, hindering biological understanding and interpretation. In order to extract causal features, we propose using instrumental variable (IV) regression with genetic variants as IVs. Specifically, we propose Deep Feature Extraction via Instrumental Variable Regression (DeepFEIVR), which uses a nonlinear neural network to extract causal features from three-dimensional neuroimages to predict an outcome (eg, AD status in our application) while maintaining a linear relationship between the extracted features and IVs. DeepFEIVR not only can handle high dimensional individual-level data for model building, but also is applicable to GWAS summary data to test associations of the extracted features with the outcome in subsequent analysis. In addition, we propose an extension of DeepFEIVR, called DeepFEIVR-CA, for covariate adjustment (CA). We apply DeepFEIVR and DeepFEIVR-CA to the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) individual-level data as training data for model building, then apply to the UK Biobank neuroimaging and the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP) AD GWAS summary data, showcasing how the extracted causal features are related to AD and various brain endophenotypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".