MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381188495 · doi:10.51657/ric.v7i1.51951

Les conclusions formulées par Boyer et Bissonnette en 2021 sont valables en 2023 : une réponse au texte de Allaire et ses coll``egues (2022)

2023· article· fr· W4381188495 on OpenAlex
Steve Bissonnette

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale du CRIRES innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité TÉLUQ
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boyer and Bissonnette (2021) published a synthesis of research that measured the effects of virtual school on student achievement before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The researchers showed that fully online schools generally produce significantly lower learning gains than brick-and-mortar schools. Following this publication, Allaire et al. (2022) reanalyzed some of this research and present different arguments attempting to mitigate the ineffectiveness of virtual schools. In this article, we take up each of these arguments and demonstrate that they are flawed, invalid, and unauthorized. Therefore, we consider the conclusions made by Boyer and Bissonnette in 2021 to be just as valid and tenable in 2023!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it