MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381192905 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346623

Recurrent solar density transients in the slow wind observed with the Metis coronagraph

2023· article· en· W4381192905 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Ventura, E. Antonucci, Cooper Downs, P. Romano, Roberto Susino, D. Spadaro, Daniele Telloni, S. L. Guglielmino, G. Capuano, V. Andretta, Federico Landini, G. Jerse, G. Nicolini, M. Pancrazzi, C. Sasso, Vania Da Deppo, Silvano Fineschi, C. Grimani, P. Heinzel, D. Moses, G. Naletto, M. Romoli, M. Stangalini, L. Teriaca, M. Uslenghi

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und EnergieNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsSolar radiusCorona (planetary geology)Solar rotationAstrophysicsSolar windCoronagraphHelmet streamerCoronal holeAstronomySolar minimumSolar maximumScale heightCoronal mass ejectionPlasmaSolar physicsSolar cycleExoplanetPlanet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims We aim to investigate and characterize the morphology and dynamics of small-scale coronal plasma density inhomogeneities detected as brighter, denser features propagating outward through the solar corona in the visible-light images of the Metis coronagraph on board Solar Orbiter on February 22, 2021. Our main focus is on investigating their possible origin and contribution to the slow wind variability and dynamics and their dependence on coronal magnetic field configurations and structure. Methods. The method adopted is based on the computations of autocorrelation and cross-correlation functions applied to temporal and spatial series of total brightness as a function of the heliocentric distance and solar latitudes. Results. We find that the plasma density inhomogeneities studied here are small-scale structures with typical radial and transverse sizes, as projected on the plane of sky, on the order of 500 Mm and 40 Mm, respectively, and that they are up to 24 times brighter than the ambient solar wind. The brighter density structures exhibit longer lifetime and more stable shape and dimensions as they travel toward the outer edge of the field of view. The enhanced density structures are ejected with a most probable cadence of about 80 min at or below the inner edge of the Metis field of view (within 3.1 R ⊙ –5.7 R ⊙ at the time of observations) in a wide latitudinal region corresponding to the site of a complex web of separatrix and quasi-separatrix layers, as resulting from the simulated magnetohydrodynamic configuration of the west limb of the solar corona. Some of the moving density enhancements clearly show morphological characteristics compatible with the switchback phenomenon, supporting the results indicating that the switchbacks occur at the coronal level. The enhanced density structures were ejected into the ambient slow wind with a mean velocity of about 240 ± 40 km s −1 , which is significantly higher than that deduced for the ambient solar wind on the basis of previous Metis observations during the solar minimum of cycle 24. The absence of acceleration observed across the coronagraph field of view suggests that the ejected plasmoids are progressively reaching the expansion rate of the ambient wind. Conclusions. The results suggest that the quasi-periodic enhanced-density plasmoids might be the consequence of reconnection phenomena occurring in the complex web of the separatrix and quasi-separatrix layers present in the solar corona. Moreover, the structural characteristics of some of the detected plasmoids are in favor of the presence of switchbacks that originate during interchange reconnection processes occurring at or below 3 R ⊙ in the S-web. The speed of the plasma ejected in the reconnection process is higher than that of the ambient slow solar wind and is likely to be related to the energy involved in the process generating the propagating structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207