A unified framework for multi-lead ECG characterization using Laplacian Eigenmaps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background. The analysis of multi-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) signals requires integrating the information derived from each lead to reach clinically relevant conclusions. This analysis could benefit from data-driven methods compacting the information in those leads into lower-dimensional representations (i.e. 2 or 3 dimensions instead of 12). Objective. We propose Laplacian Eigenmaps (LE) to create a unified framework where ECGs from different subjects can be compared and their abnormalities are enhanced. Approach. We conceive a normal reference ECG space based on LE, calculated using signals of healthy subjects in sinus rhythm. Signals from new subjects can be mapped onto this reference space creating a loop per heartbeat that captures ECG abnormalities. A set of parameters, based on distance metrics and on the shape of loops, are proposed to quantify the differences between subjects. Main results. This methodology was applied to find structural and arrhythmogenic changes in the ECG. The LE framework consistently captured the characteristics of healthy ECGs, confirming that normal signals behaved similarly in the LE space. Significant differences between normal signals, and those from patients with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy were detected. In contrast, LE biomarkers did not identify differences between patients with cardiomyopathy and a history of ventricular arrhythmia and their matched controls. Significance. This LE unified framework offers a new representation of multi-lead signals, reducing dimensionality while enhancing imperceptible abnormalities and enabling the comparison of signals of different subjects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".