MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381194056 · doi:10.11159/ehst23.001

On The Role of Thermal Storage for Demand Response in Building Clusters

2023· article· en· W4381194056 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ursula Eicker

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference of Energy Harvesting, Storage, and Transfer · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal energy storageComputer scienceThermalOn demandMeteorologyPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate action plans worldwide mostly rely on increasing the share of renewables and electrification of heating systems in urban areas. The intermittent nature of renewable sources imposes various challenges on users and grid operators due to the variability of energy supply, including grid congestion and overload or renewable curtailment. In addition, the electrification of heating systems will lead to extra pressure on the grid, especially during peak hours, with significant load variation during the day. Hence, a transition in the perception of electricity availability is necessary for the robust integration of renewable sources into the electricity grid and electrification of the building heating sector. The "production-on-demand" approach, where electricity is unlimited, should be replaced by the idea of "consumption-on-demand," where managing the users' demand helps minimize the stress on the grid in periods of low renewable electricity generation or high demands. Flexible operation of energy systems is a solution to the mentioned challenges as it enables demand-side management and, thereby, demand response based on the requirements of the surrounding grids, narrowing the gap between the users' demand and supply from renewable sources or the grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference of Energy Harvesting, Storage, and TransferSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207