Alexithymic characteristics and interoceptive abilities are associated with disease severity and levels of C-reactive protein and cytokines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Alexithymia and atypical gut-brain signaling have been linked to the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We herein assessed IBD patients' alexithymia levels and interoceptive abilities, and detected potential correlations with psychological distress, symptom severity and disease activity, and inflammation indices. Methods: Adult IBD outpatients and healthy controls were recruited. Alexithymia was assessed using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, interoceptive accuracy using the Heartbeat Counting Test (cardiac interoception) and the Water Load Test-II (gastric interoception), and interoceptive sensibility using the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). Results: Forty-one patients with Crohn's disease (CD), 16 with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 50 healthy controls were included. In CD patients, the level of externally oriented thinking and total alexithymia score were correlated with disease activity (P=0.027 and P=0.047, respectively), while in UC patients difficulties in identifying emotions were linked to disease activity (P=0.007). In CD patients, the Noticing, Not-Worrying and Emotional Awareness MAIA subscale score were correlated with C-reactive protein levels (P=0.005, P=0.048 and P=0.005), the Noticing subscale score with interleukin (IL)-1β levels (r=-0.350, P=0.039), the Not-Distracting subscale score with IL-6 levels (r=-0.402, P=0.017), and the Emotional Awareness subscale score with IL-1β (r=-0.367, P=0.030) and IL-6 (r=-0.379, P=0.025) levels. Finally, in UC patients, the Not-Worrying subscale score was significantly associated with IL-6 levels (r=-0.532, P=0.049), while difficulties in identifying emotions were linked to IL-8 levels (r=0.604, P=0.022). Conclusion: Emotional and interoceptive processing is associated with IBD disease activity, suggesting a potential implication for IBD pathophysiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".