Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proposed subject has tremendous significance for specialists in the field of studying iconography, Armenian miniature painting and theology, since the article examines and analyzes the relationship of miniatures of the masters of the Armenian community of New Julfa (Isfahan, Iran) with the works of Armenian miniaturists of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth of the first quarter of the 17th century. This is especially presented in the iconography of full-page miniatures with the biblical and apocalyptical scenes in the traditions of the East and West. Thus, the miniatures of the Bible (Matenadaran, M351) illuminated by the master Ghazar Baberdatsi in the Armenian monastery of the Assumption of Theotokos at Lvov in 1616–1619 are directly affected on the development of iconographic schemes of miniatures created by the New Julfan craftsmen in the second quarter of the seventeenth century. Such influence, in particular, can be traced in the works of the master Hayrapet Jughayetsi. Also, thanks to the surviving colophons of the Lvov Bible, a number of aspects related to the attribution of the authorship of miniatures have become clear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".