MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381299157 · doi:10.1039/d3fo00300k

The effectiveness of treatment with probiotics in<i>Helicobacter pylori</i>eradication: results from an umbrella meta-analysis on meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

2023· review· en· W4381299157 on OpenAlexaff
Vali Musazadeh, Ahmad Nazari, Amir Hossein Faghfouri, Mohammad Reza Emami, Zeynab Kavyani, Maryam Zokaei, Parmida Jamilian, Meysam Zarezadeh, Ahmad Saedisomeolia

Bibliographic record

VenueFood & Function · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersTabriz University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsMeta-analysisHelicobacter pyloriRandomized controlled trialOdds ratioInternal medicineMedicineProbioticConfidence intervalWeb of scienceRelative riskSubgroup analysisGastroenterologyBiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this umbrella meta-analysis was to quantitatively summarize meta-analyses of randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies regarding the effects of probiotic supplementation on Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) eradication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.034
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.066
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0340.066
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0220.040
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.272
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood & FunctionSame topicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesFrench-language works237,207