MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381301815 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3281128

DeepBSL: 3-D Personalized Deep Binaural Sound Localization on Earable Devices

2023· article· en· W4381301815 on OpenAlexafffund
Awny M. El-Mohandes, Navid H. Zandi, Rong Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceHeadphonesBinaural recordingAzimuthSpeech recognitionHead-related transfer functionNoise (video)Artificial intelligenceAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prevalence of earable devices, such as earbuds and headphones, allows people to converse or listen to audio recordings on the move but often at the cost of reduced alertness of imminent health and safety threats in their surroundings. 3-D binaural sound localization (BSL), which aims to locate sound sources in space, plays a key role in improving one’s situation awareness. BSL on earable devices is inherently challenging due to the limited number of microphones available as well as subject- and location-dependent filtration effects of a person’s pinna, head and torso, described by head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). In this work, we develop DeepBSL, a deep neural network model to estimate azimuth and elevation angles of sound sources relative to a person’s head. For a new subject, an efficient procedure is developed to collect HRTFs at sparse locations using in-ear microphones and a mobile phone, which are then utilized to synthesize sounds of any type at arbitrary locations to train personalized DeepBSL models. Extensive evaluations using synthetic data from a public data set and through real-world experiments demonstrate that the personalized DeepBSL models are data-efficient and can achieve better-than-human performances in BSL while significantly outperforming a state-of-the-art model that can only predict azimuth angles of sound sources. Our best performing model has an average azimuth prediction error of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2.9^{\circ } (4.1^{\circ })$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and elevation prediction error of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1.4^{\circ } (2.9^{\circ })$ </tex-math></inline-formula> in an indoor (outdoor) environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207