MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381304659 · doi:10.1039/d3nh90021e

Contents list

2023· article· it· W4381304659 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale Horizons · 2023
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiIndian Institute of Science Education and Research MohaliShaanxi Normal UniversityUniversitat de LleidaXiamen UniversityChinese Academy of SciencesJiangnan UniversitySuzhou UniversityHarbin Engineering UniversityQueen's UniversityChalmers Tekniska HögskolaUlsan National Institute of Science and TechnologyPurdue UniversityQueen Mary University of LondonImperial College LondonEmory UniversityUniversity of QueenslandSuzhou University of Science and TechnologyQingdao UniversityHunan UniversityNanyang Technological UniversityQueen's University BelfastUniversity of Texas at AustinTianjin UniversityDalian Institute of Chemical PhysicsIndian Institute of ScienceUniversity of British ColumbiaGeorgia Institute of Technology
KeywordsAcknowledgementAttributionComputer scienceChromatin structure remodeling (RSC) complexWorld Wide WebLibrary scienceComputer securityPsychologyChemistrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permissions Request permissions Contents list Nanoscale Horiz., 2023, 8, 709 DOI: 10.1039/D3NH90021E This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given. Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9540.924

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscale HorizonsSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207