Canada’s Healthcare System Needs a Paradigm Shift to Meet Current and Future Medical Needs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UPS Canada's healthcare system was already under immense pressure before the COVID-19 pandemic.Hallway medicine, weeks-long wait times, overcrowded emergency departments, and exhausted healthcare professionals were the norm.The COVID-19 pandemic has only further exacerbated the problems in our healthcare system.The structure of today's healthcare system was first established in the 1960s 1 and operates in a treatment-focused manner, comprised mostly of doctors and hospitals.2 Healthcare needs of the past were predominantly for the treatment of acute diseases and injuries.However, an increasingly aging population and the prevalence of chronic diseases, often associated with functional impairment or disability, are changing the types of health services requested.Reforming the structure of Canada's healthcare system is imperative to address the evolving needs of the population.What Canadians need the most is a reformed healthcare system that will improve access and provide the most cost-efficient and appropriate care for all, by investing in the distribution of healthcare services through primary care, virtual care, and long-term and home care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.016 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".