In Vitro Inhibition of Evaporation with Perfluorohexyloctane, an Eye Drop for Dry Eye Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perfluorohexyloctane (PFHO) MIEBOTM, formerly (NOV03) is a single component, water-free eye drop approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States for the treatment of dry eye disease. We evaluated the in vitro inhibitory effect of PFHO on the evaporation rate (Revap) of saline. Evaporation rates were measured gravimetrically at 25°C or 35°C. The evaporation rate (Revap) of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was measured following the application of 11-200 µL PFHO or 100 µL artificial tears (Soothe XP [Bausch + Lomb, Bridgewater, New Jersey], Systane Balance [Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas], and Systane Ultra [Alcon]). The effect of PFHO on the Revap of PBS was further evaluated following the addition of 50 mg/mL mucin to PBS and compared with that of meibum lipid collected from a 68 year-old White volunteer. At 25°C the mean (SEM) Revap of PBS alone or PFHO alone was 4.06 (0.06) and 0.137 (0.004) µm/min, respectively. Layering 100 µL PFHO over PBS inhibited the Revap of PBS by 81% (P < 0.0001), whereas artificial tears had no effect. The presence of mucin attenuated the inhibition of the Revap of PBS by PFHO by 17% (P < 0.0001). At 35°C, the Revap of PBS was inhibited by 88% when layering 100 µL PFHO over PBS and 28% when applying a single 11 µL drop of PFHO (P value < 0.0001 for both). Meibum lipid inhibited the Revap of PBS by 8% at this temperature, whereas the combination of a drop of PFHO plus meibum inhibited the Revap of PBS by 34%. PFHO significantly inhibited the Revap of saline in this in vitro model. The data support the idea that PHFO may form an antievaporative layer on the tear film surface and may be a functional substitute for the native tear-film lipid layer in patients with dry eye disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".