Characterizing hydraulic fracture growth using distributed acoustic sensing-recorded microseismic reflections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Hydraulic fracturing is crucial for enhancing hydrocarbon production from unconventional reservoirs. The characterization of fracture geometry and propagation has significant value in understanding reservoir response and designing more efficient completions. Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) is a rapidly developing technology that can be used for this purpose because it provides wide-aperture observations of microseismic wavefields that contain direct P and S arrivals as well as converted and reflected waves. In addition to traditional approaches for microseismic event location and source mechanism analysis, the high spatial resolution of DAS microseismic recordings allows the imaging of induced fractures with reflected waves. Reflections are generated by waves radiated from microseismic events that impinge on hydraulic fractures created during prior treatment stages. We use a straightforward method based on f-k filtering and ray tracing to map reflected S waves from the time domain to reflectivity in the space domain. A case study of fracture imaging indicates that inferred fracture development, based on reflection imaging, is consistent with fracture-driven interactions observed using low-frequency DAS (LF-DAS) data. In addition, this study reveals reflection images of apparent distal fractures that do not reach the fiber and thus are not directly observed by LF-DAS. Fracture images obtained from several microseismic events during the same stage provide the opportunity to observe snapshots of dynamic fracture evolution processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".