A genome-scale dynamic constraint-based modelling (gDCBM) framework predicts growth dynamics, medium composition and intracellular flux distributions in CHO clonal variations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optimizing mammalian cell growth and bioproduction is a tedious task. However, due to the inherent complexity of eukaryotic cells, heuristic experimental approaches such as, metabolic engineering and bioprocess design, are frequently integrated with mathematical models of cell culture to improve biological process efficiency and find paths for improvement. Constraint-based metabolic models have evolved over the last two decades to be used for dynamic modelling in addition to providing a linear description of steady-state metabolic systems. Formulation and implementation of the underlying optimization problems require special attention to the model's performance and feasibility, lack of defects in the definition of system components, and consideration of optimal alternate solutions, in addition to processing power limitations. Here, the time-resolved dynamics of a genome-scale metabolic network of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell metabolism are shown using a genome-scale dynamic constraint-based modelling framework (gDCBM). The metabolic network was adapted from a reference model of CHO genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM), iCHO_DG44_v1, and dynamic restrictions were imposed to its exchange fluxes based on experimental results. We used this framework for predicting physiological changes in CHO clonal variants. Because of the methodical creation of the components for the flux balance analysis optimization problem and the integration of a switch time, this model can generate sequential predictions of intracellular fluxes during growth and non-growth phases (per hour of culture time) and transparently reveal the shortcomings in such practice. As a result of the differences exploited by various clones, we can understand the relevance of changes in intracellular flux distribution and exometabolomics. The integration of various omics data into the given gDCBM framework, as well as the reductionist analysis of the model, can further help bioprocess optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".