MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4381377543 · doi:10.2337/db23-408-p

408-P: Associations between Apolipoprotein B (apoB): Apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1) Ratio and Metabolic and Kidney Disease in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes

2023· article· en· W4381377543 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lauryn Remmers, Carissa Birznieks, Diego S. Carrasco, Susan Gross, Janet K. Snell‐Bergeon, LUCY A. HALL, Kristen J. Nadeau, Petter Bjornstad, Kalie L. Tommerdahl

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApolipoprotein BRenal functionInternal medicineEndocrinologyApolipoprotein A1CreatinineMedicineAlbuminuriaLipoproteinKidney diseaseDiabetes mellitusChemistryCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ApoA1 is a major protein component of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and apoB the main protein component of low-density lipoprotein (LDL). The ratio between apoB and apoA1 (ApoB:ApoA1) is often used to measure cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in adults, yet little is known about its relationship with insulin resistance, central adiposity and early kidney disease, important CVD risk factors, in youth with T1D. In a study of 50 youth with type 1 diabetes, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) were assessed using iohexol and p-aminohippurate clearance, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) was also measured. Central adiposity was assessed using DXA and insulin sensitivity was estimated (eIS). Intraglomerular pressure was estimated using the Gomez equations. The study participants were 16±3.0 years old, 50% were female, and their average HbA1c was 8.7±1.3%. They had an average T1D duration of 5.7±2.6 years, with UACR levels of 6[5-14] mg/g and GFR of 189±40 ml/min. Concentrations of apoA1 and apoB were quantified by targeted nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. ApoA1 (185±35 vs. 150±36 mg/dl, p=0.001) and apoB (108±29 vs. 90±27 mg/dl, p=0.03) were higher in girls vs. boys, but the apoB:apoA1 ratio was similar between the sexes (p=0.59). ApoB correlated with PGLO (r: 0.42, p=0.01), log UACR (r: 0.33, p=0.02), and trunk mass (r: 0.34, p=0.02), whereas ApoB:ApoA1 correlated with GFR (r: 0.44, p=0.002), PGLO (r: 0.48, p=0.01), log UACR (r: 0.38, p=0.008), trunk mass (r: 0.45, p=0.001), BMI (r: 0.40, p=0.004) and inversely with eIS (-0.44, p=0.001). The ratio of apoB to apoA1 associated with markers of metabolic and kidney disease in youth with T1D. Further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind these associations and to identify potential strategies for preventing or mitigating cardiovascular disease in young persons with T1D. Disclosure L.Remmers: None. C.Birznieks: None. D.Carrasco: None. S.Gross: None. J.K.Snell-bergeon: None. L.A.Hall: None. K.J.Nadeau: None. P.Bjornstad: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Lilly, Horizon Therapeutics plc, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., LG Chem, Consultant; Bayer Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. K.L.Tommerdahl: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207