Adversarial autoencoder concurrent projection to latent structure and its application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Multivariate monitoring plays an important role in process monitoring. Among the multivariate monitoring methods, the projection to latent structure method (PLS) has been most widely used in the fields of quality control and fault diagnosis. To improve the monitoring capability of traditional PLS methods in nonlinear and non‐Gaussian multivariate systems, this paper proposes an innovative multivariate monitoring strategy, which combines adversarial autoencoder (AAE) and the concurrent projection to latent structure method (CPLS). In the proposed strategy, the original data are mapped to the high‐dimensional space using the AAE method with the Gaussian prior distribution to realize data transformation. The mapped data are linearly divisible and approach the Gaussian distribution. Then, the projection with orthogonality is realized using the CPLS method. In addition, the reconstruction error and distribution properties are used as evaluation indexes of the high‐dimensional mapping performance. The corresponding monitoring strategy is established using the traditional statistical method based on the Gaussian distribution. Finally, the simulations are performed on the Tennessee‐Eastman process platform, and the results show that the proposed method could efficiently extract the principal components, especially in quality‐relevant fault monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".