O movimento feminista negro em Belo Horizonte e seus repertórios de ação coletiva
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo tem por objetivo abordar o movimento feminista negro na cidade de Belo Horizonte, seus repertórios de ação coletiva e de interação com o governo local. Apoia-se em abordagens teóricas dos estudos de movimentos sociais, mobilizando o conceito de repertório de ação coletiva, bem como as interseções entre os movimentos feminista e negro e a pauta da interseccionalidade. A metodologia de cunho qualitativo recorre a levantamentos documentais e entrevistas em profundidade com ativistas do movimento feminista negro. Mapearam-se os seguintes repertórios de ação coletiva do movimento feminista negro de Belo Horizonte e de interação com o governo local: a) protestos e ação direta, b) participação institucionalizada; c) ocupação de cargos na burocracia por ativistas e d) ocupação política, por meio dos quais o movimento feminista negro tem incidido nas políticas municipais, na perspectiva interseccional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".