O movimento feminista negro em Belo Horizonte e seus repertórios de ação coletiva
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo tem por objetivo abordar o movimento feminista negro na cidade de Belo Horizonte, seus repertórios de ação coletiva e de interação com o governo local. Apoia-se em abordagens teóricas dos estudos de movimentos sociais, mobilizando o conceito de repertório de ação coletiva, bem como as interseções entre os movimentos feminista e negro e a pauta da interseccionalidade. A metodologia de cunho qualitativo recorre a levantamentos documentais e entrevistas em profundidade com ativistas do movimento feminista negro. Mapearam-se os seguintes repertórios de ação coletiva do movimento feminista negro de Belo Horizonte e de interação com o governo local: a) protestos e ação direta, b) participação institucionalizada; c) ocupação de cargos na burocracia por ativistas e d) ocupação política, por meio dos quais o movimento feminista negro tem incidido nas políticas municipais, na perspectiva interseccional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".